Hammond Z2 vs Tenergy 64 — different scales, honest comparison

Manufacturer figures

These two manufacturers publish on different scales, so the figures cannot be compared side by side — the denominators differ, and neither can be called higher. Each is shown separately with its own scale.

Hammond Z2Nittaku official (scale maximum not published)
Spin 13 / 14.5Speed 16 / 16.5
Tenergy 64Butterfly official, 0-100
Spin 70 / 100Speed 87 / 100Arc 75 / 100

What actually differs

Both are tension rubbers tuned toward speed, which is why they often end up on the same shortlist. Their official figures, however, cannot rank them.

Nittaku publishes speed and spin without stating the maximum of its scale; Butterfly states 0–100. Comparing numbers with different denominators is meaningless, and converting one to the other would assert something the manufacturer never claimed. That is why this site does not chart them together.

On specification, Hammond Z2 is the firmer of the two. A firmer sponge asks for more swing speed and returns more power when you supply it.

The price gap is clear: Tenergy 64 carries Butterfly’s top-line pricing and Hammond Z2 sits below it. On a wing that wears rubber quickly — typically the backhand — that difference compounds over a year.

Hammond Z2

Surface typeInverted
TackinessNon-tacky
Sponge hardness40° (50° German scale)
Thickness optionsMAX / Extra thick (1.9-2.1mm) / Thick (1.7-1.9mm) / Medium (1.4-1.7mm)
ColoursRed / Black
Made inJapan

Tenergy 64

Surface typeInverted
TackinessNon-tacky
Sponge hardness36
Thickness options2.1 / 1.9mm
ColoursRed / Black
Made inJapan